cM :: MORLEY|DIGITAL

Excuses, Excuses

by Chris Morley on Jun.16, 2008, under Industry Analysis

I’ve witnessed a very comical phenomena in the system building business in the past several months.  Two companies have come up with the ultimate spin as to why they have not joined the rest of us in the year 2008 when it came to their system configurations.  One spoke very eloquently as to why they were not introducing a new chipset that would allow compatibility with the latest and greatest processor (or was it why they weren’t releasing the latest and greatest processor period?), and the other, well, just randomly talked in a circle about how not innovating was actually innovating.

What was interesting to me and those in the know was the motives behind these public announcements and the real problems they were trying to cover up.  Normally I’d just chuckle and move on, but what bugged me was the subtle and not so subtle inference that those of us who in fact were able to bring these new products to market were somehow doing a disservice to our customers, as if we did not properly qualify the components.  Without offering any specific assertion that new components had critical issues that would have delivered an unacceptable customer experience, these companies rather insinuated that sitting on their hands was actually doing their customers a favor.

Of course, I had to wait until today when they, like all of us, were falling all over themselves to launch the latest NVIDIA graphics solutions before I decided to post this.  Because I knew it would underscore my point. 

You see, our business thrives on being first to market.  Typically a boutique is given very early access to bleeding edge hardware.  We are quick to react, and are great brand holders for companies like NVIDIA, AMD, and Intel.  We are able to qualify, tweak, and productize a component faster than your typical Tier 1 for various reasons.

Some of the delays large companies face in being first to market have nothing at all to do with their postured position regarding “careful R&D,” etc, but rather the normal bureaucracy that the entire industry faces. 

Since one of my companies is direct with Microsoft, I am very intimate with what all it takes to do business with Microsoft on a direct level.  There’s WHQL certification of systems, making sure your models are on your DTOS (Desktop Operating System agreement), creating new images and recovery media for deployment of systems, and registering said images with an Authorized Replicator.  Sheesh, it’s time consuming!  And not one part of that has to do with stability testing, thermals, etc!

Then there’s the creative team that has to create marketing collateral around a product launch.  Pictures, press releases, and web development.  That takes time too!

Then, and here’s the key:  SUPPLY CHAIN.  This is key because it can really stick a company in more ways than one.  First, if you’re deploying your systems into retail, you need a lot of parts quick, and that can be a hassle for a hot new video card or CPU.  Secondly, since you’re playing a price game on margin - you’re ordering quantity to get the best price and that can be a gamble when it comes to an unknown product’s performance and market acceptance.  The larger the company, the more complex this step is.  For smaller boutiques, it’s easy to get 10, 20, or even 30 hot-off-the-press parts for launch, and sometimes that’s all you need if they’re an Extreme Edition CPU or $649 video card.  And believe me, companies HATE missing launch dates, because you’re sure to get a call from your IHV as to why you’re not selling their product but you still expect that quarterly MDF check!

So what happens if supply chain screws up, and you bought too many of the previous generation’s video cards or motherboards…yuck.  And that hot new 45nm CPU?  Yeah, it doesn’t work on that motherboard you bought a metric ton of.  Or those video cards?  Eek, they shrunk ‘em, tweaked ‘em, chopped the price, and released a new model.  And those mobos you bought for retail?  Yeah, underpowered and boring, and the model didn’t sell well, ACK! 

So what do you do?  Well, it seems like the only logical thing is to tell the public that you’re protecting their interests by continuing to sell the old and busted, and all those guys selling the new hotness are really just mavericks preying on your ignorance!

Well, in the words of Al Pacino in Glengarry Glen Ross, “Your excuses are your own!”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
:, ,
  • Rahul can say what he wants - I don't blame the guy for talking the way he does about his company - it's how he got where he is today. What I do take issue is when you try to throw someone else under the bus because you bet on the wrong horse.

    But that incident is just one example of one company. Others are guilty as well.
  • I hate that you wrote this and I didn't :) The fact is that it may be legitimate for companies to hold back product if they can't get it to be stable for their customers -- but a real all-star integrator is the one who CAN get it to make sense, so their customers have access to cutting edge hardware when it's actually still cutting edge. Multinational OEM's are by nature always behind the curve, and the fact that Rahul tried to talk his way around that is just funny. The ultimate challenge is how to grow the business and keep the agility of the boutique.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Looking for something?

Use the form below to search the site:

Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!

Categories

 

June 2008
M T W T F S S
« Mar   Jul »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30